>>37411660>Humanoid traits doesn't make it not a cartoon fox. The same applies with "ambigous" thing at this point, because it has 2 animals traits but it's still cartoonish. It has fox traits because it's basically a humanoid fox, that's all, how can't you understand?
>Yes they are. Nothing about specifically looks like a dog.Its fur is more like a spitz, rather than a fox, just take a look at how fox puppies are.
> >>37408628 #I said "others like those" for reason, i wasn't talking to all the gen 1 pokémon, but those who resembles more like real life animals.
>But it does. It's just a cartoon version of a real life animalExcept there is a reason if it has animal traits, maybe because is based on it? But other than that, the pokémon has other traits which is superficial saying "just a cartoon animal".
>"Cartoon kaiju" doesn't mean anything because "kaiju" can mean fucking anything.Nope because there are many kaijus which gf just takes inspirations from.
>Animals in the real world share traits in their appearance you idiot.If they're the same specie yes, if not it's just barely. For an example, lapras and nidoqueen having the same head doesn't make any sense. Venonat literally being just the head of butterfree, doesn't make any sense and just makes everything confused.
