>>37481181my argument is that your lack of argument means i needn't present one myself.
normally i'd conclude you are a troll by this point, but poltards are really this stupid so ill give you another chance to understand basic argument procedure:
a. poster a said /pol/ is always right with no fact to back his claims
b. poster b sent him to tardom/delusiontown
c. poster a/c asked for an argument for the counter argument, despite no argument in stage a. to begin with
if you will reply with 'no argument, i accept your concession' i will see it as admitance to being a troll.
your move.
