>>37653161Yes he claimed we'd get Pokemon in a direct. He had a wrong source at the time, the same one Markus had
>>37653169But that's the point. I never claimed it will be revealed this week, but even if I did, my claims would be worthless. There's been plenty of leaks even here on /vp/ that say a 26th reveal. Some a lot more questionable then others. Both of our opinions are worthless, but I just hate people like OP who claim things that objectively aren't true. It isn't true that its been debunked. it hasn't been debunked. People like OP are the same idiots who believe a leaked Pokemon is fake just because someone can redraw it, when inactuality they don't know at all if it's real or fake.
The overall point is people should remain skeptical and shouldn't take sides and claim things are fact. There's a difference between saying "I think a reveal will or won't happen this week" Or saying "it's confirmed to not be happening because reasons" or "it's definitely/not happening this week"
