>>37741243Then again, that viewpoint can be seen as Villainous bbecause its easily corruptable due to Human nature; "Someone who stands up against villainy will find a lack of opposition, thus will start judging others to fit a new definition so they have purpose."
Think of it like a Slippery Slope theory of Corruption.
"A Knight kills a Demon who ate babies because the Demon liked killing babies for fun." -Righteous and Just Hero
"A Knight kills a Dragon rampaging a town because the town stole from it."
Protector of the People's Interest
"A Knight kills a hungry Mother bear trying to feed her starving cubs" <--- Corruption begins here
"A Knight kills a man who struck a baron who taxed his land"
Goon of the State
"A Knight kills a man for jaywalking"
Heavy Handed Law Enforcement
"A Knight kills a man for looking at him wrong"
Violent Thug
"A Knight forges fake evidence towards someone sleeping with the girl he likes and then executes him publicly"
Machivellian Manipulator
"A Knight kills people because he is bored and he needs to keep his sword arm strong"
Inhuman Monster
"A Knight kills babies for fun and because they are easier."
Demon.
I'd like to see something like this.
A group of Knights who think they are blessed by God/State who think they are doing the right thing, but they are corrupted while holding onto the lie of their Divine Providence as their actions get more heavy handed, manipulative, and wicked.
