>>37766497Here we go
>How fucking dull and slow of a person are you that such a simple concept only just occurred to you with LGPE? Just because people suggested it doesn't make it a good idea. Mostly because the stupid fucks here have no goddamn clue how to make a decent game that flows.
>Now you're just crying and rambling about nothing at this point.Bullshit. Breath of the Wild but with Pokemon was spouted so much after release it should've been a fucking meme.
Which was always a bad idea, for a ton of reasons.
>First literally nobody cared, now it's just a shit ideaThings can be both you dense fuck. I shouldn't have to elaborate "nobody" is hyperbole, what I meant was nobody who actually knows the franchise and gives a damn if they make good games about it cares. And it is a fucking stupid idea. Until something like that happen in a core game that doesn't have Go catching mechanics, no theoretical gameplay is going to change that
Who? Go ahead and cube that number for the amount of RPGs that aren't still stuck in the '80s
Way to prove you have no fucking idea what you're talking about, and that you haven't played a single JRPG outside of Pokemon.
>But you don't understand anything, you're just whining about strawmen with inflammatory ignorant remarksI've been offering more than you, you conceited fuck. Who ironically has been doing everything you accuse me of doing.
>Random encounters were always built around hardware limitationsThat doesn't make them bad you dipshit, limitation inspires creativity and helps build a brand.
Many games who had random encounters still hold up well today, including the Pokemon games.
>please stop pretending Pokémon or really any other RPG would have originally been built this way if it didn't have to beFucking Christ. Are you seriously trying to use the "George Lucas" defense at him and think of it as a 'positive'
Now I know you're a child, because only a child would say something like that.
Please off yourself
