>>37772629>Considering that Incineroar generally is upclose, it wouldn't be a problem.Considering the flames are portrayed as a mid-range swirl attack in the reference art that doesn't make sense. If it was more of an in-your-face explosion you would have a point.
>And anon, the thing is at the neck, not the head or mouth. It dangles. Even in animation it isn't firm to the point that the attack makes it look like it automatically moves.I think you're completely missing what I'm trying to say about Torracat. The point isn't where the flames are, but that it still fires the flames from the mouth and not the external flame. As, Torracat's flame chime would be hard to aim with, so it doesn't and fires from the mouth instead.
A lot of stoic looking pokemon have wild fur too. Incineroar's overall design is about being exaggerated and expressive, even if you remove his expression. From his movement to his style of
fighting.As you might have noticed I always wrote expression + pose/the way it carries itself. The point is that the other version also has not only an expressive facial expression, but also its pose.
>>37772577>Incineroar is more of a “theme I’m not really interested in” rather than “it’s a hot mess and nothing in it makes sense/awkward”.Well we haven't talked about its arms and hands in this conversation.
