>>37812334It's lewd/sexual drawings of children. But I understand the reason for tip towing around the real issue.
The original statement was an attack on the fact that they were trying to justify it as "they're of age" when that just isn't the case. No one is looking at the art of the girl from Let's Go I mentioned before and thinking that she is of age. Mainly because it's near impossible to.
I'd much more prefer people to own up to what they do, ironically, sarcastically or not, than to try and justify that the obvious jail bait artwork is of a girl that is "of age".
My point was don't try to make up some nonsense to justify this shit. Does rubbing one out to that make you a predator? I have no clue. But it sure as hell doesn't look good. And hey, if you're okay with that so be it. Just don't try to convince anyone here that you're doing it and thinking the character is older than 18 lol.
