>>37853139>>30fps from gen 3's 60>caring about fps in a game where the only movement are pixel sprites with simple animationsWhat a joke. Do you want them to have extra frames where nothing happens, just so they can stamp the "60 FPS" logo on it?? Btw, you know gen 3 only had 60 FPS because the RNG frame advances each frame, and they wanted that rate of advancement right?
>Pt drops framesLiterally who cares? I've never noticed this, and even if I had I wouldn't have cared because that isn't important at all.
>casualised contestsGood. They were unpopular.
>BF goes from 7 facilities to 5>battle palace is lostBattle palace was garbage. It's just a matter of Arena/Pike/Pyramid/Dome vs Arcade/Castle/Hall, which is generally subjective, but I can see the argument for leaning Emerald. Overall this is not a big enough change to warrant complaining about.
>shit about bases and undergroundThe base system was fine in gen 4, your complaints are just pedantic nitpicks. Input lag in underground is slightly annoying, but all around the underground is a much more interesting system than just using secret power on bushes.
>shit about DPYeah they were shit.
>broken onlineIt wasn't that bad, and was better than no online.
>muh legendaries puzzlesThe only ones that fit your nitpick are Uxie and Azelf, and given their plot involvement it's not problematic at all.
>rehashed RSE's plotPt did the evil organization wants the legendary pokemon plot better than RSE, and it's not like that general plot structure is unique and specific enough to really be called copying in the first place. Cyrus is more interesting, and Archie/Maxie's development feels forced.
And then for Platinum:
>better level curve than emerald>more postgame than emerald>water routes are more tolerable than in emerald>allows transfers from the previous gen unlike in emerald>physical/special split unlike emerald>better rival than emerald>day night cycle unlike emerald>gen 3 > gen 4Cringe
