>>37918638Ah, I was indeed referring to the MENSA test, since it's pretty much the only standardized and reliable one. But still, if the questions remain the same for both countries (or at least they're equal in complexity), and the people chosen are completely random and they still score high then it's just as valid. Maybe it's because I went to a richfag school and didn't really grow up with idiots, but it's not like everyone in this country is a braindead chimp (well, the ones with the green handkerchiefs certainly are, but still). It's like you're assuming that they take some random Facundo, ask him what 2+2 is and when he gets it right "well, Facundo definitely has an IQ of 100, we're going to use that as our base and from there everyone who solves -two- questions or more will get a higher result". That's just silly, they don't take these tests lightly or treat them as a joke.
