>>38029676Oh, I have ideas for both of those.
Part of the 3 Gens I have ideas for are:
>7 Pokémon main series games (2 per Gen plus a 10 year follow up sequel to the first Gen)>3 side series games (a Mystery Dungeon, a Ranger, and another one of my creation they've yet to do)>A series of 4 crossovers with a series of my own>2 movies (one of which is a Mystery Dungeon one)>a series (the movies and series all being non-Ash to run alongside the other movies and series)For starters, everything in
https://pastebin.com/raw/ZEvYmaGg and more would be a thing for the games.
I'm not really get into this deeply because I could literally autistically talk all day (I have about 20 pounds of paper taken up with this stuff over the years) about this but suffice it to say if I had control, there would be more everything.
What we have now and new stuff.
Though Nintendo investers likely would care for me much as TPC wouldn't be worth 90 billion for long either. There is no reason whatosever to hoard so much money or to practice the shitty kind of business they are to make that true.
The games and other projects would take as long as they need to be as high quality as possible. No more third versions unless it's sequels with new shit, no more yearly shit for the sake of it, no more abusive mobile trash (including fixing existing ones to be in line with this), etc. and I would do anything that was likely to be ultimately profitable. Bringing back all side series games unless they're absolutely not sustainable, for example.
Essentially I'd want to make both consumers and producers happy, even if that means taking in much less money for it. I don't want the company to die but I won't accept producing anything less than the tip top of quality someone is capable of for the target goal either.
