>>38101465I'm assuming we've already seen Bulbasaur and Ivysaur in which case I'd say I'm disappointed just like I already am, both the base and middle form have a nice top-down design, I think they should've kept the smoother design of Ivysaur and focused on emphasizing the plant features, you get this 50/50 split with Ivysaur and Venusaur but Bulbasaur was more so 75/25 in favour of the animal portion, if Venusaur was noticeably more plant-like I think would've added to its design, you could have seeds growing beneath the large leaves on its side that could be suggested to be attached to its offspring. You could also go for a better design to the flower, Ivysaur made the flower look like it was going to be a bit of a diamond in the rough sort of thing with its smooth petals in comparison to the more angular leaves, having the flower's bloom follow that trend instead of the jagged petals and geometric pattern would've benefited the design greatly I think. Also Venusaur should've had a more Blue colour tone given the progression from the green of Bulbasaur to the blue of Ivysaur
