>>38187525No. I think the position of wanting less content on a product is objetively retarded.
There's absolutely no reason to desire less but since the other part (which is you) can't comprehend such basic logic except from spewing fallacies without providing actual argumentation makes it less convicing and overall shows lack of a position to defend excep to be a contrarian or more technically a case of anchoring.
Oh wait, americucks can't read sentences with more than 3 words so I'll make one you can understand
>Provides more content