>>38188829Megalosaurus and Iguanadon would be the most fitting fossil mons, but we'll hopefully get a number of new fossils partly to make up for no fossils last gen and partly to reference how many fossils are in the UK.
>>38189403>since that term only applies to land animals.while the outcome of your statement was correct, this is not the definition of "dinosaur". Just fyi
>>38189613Look up Isle of Wight. The UK is actually a great place to base someplace on for tons and tons of fossils.
>>38191442That would actually be pretty neat imo. Preferably not Rock/Ghost, though. Too boring.
>>38191836Actually, Aerodactyl is very similar to early Pterosaurs in many respects. Look up Dimorphodon for the most popular example - big head with lots of teeth, no crest, long tail with a spade, etc. Naturally Aerodactyl has artistic liberties, but it still represents many features that pterosaurs had. Nothing like, say, an Azhdarchid, (which for imagery is more similar to a carnivorous giraffe with its pycnofibres, massive neck, and primarily terrestrial lifestyle,) but you have to remember that the Pterosaurs were an incredibly diverse group of animals around for as long as Dinosauria proper themselves, and you know very well how varied that group had become.
