>>38221917While I despise Islam and recognise that NZ Europeans and Maori are both facing population/culture replacement, the NZ shooter was wrong to think that what he was doing was even close to just.
In New Zealand, the least common varieties of immigrants seem to be the most respectable, with Africans and Arabs being some of the rarest. Perhaps it's racism in choosing who gets to immigrate, with the most unusual races having to be the best to get in. NZ certainly does have a high bar for immigration, and it's probably even higher for those races.
Obviously, the shooter was judging Muslims based on the ones that plague Europe, and assumed the ones in NZ were the same.
He couldn't be more wrong though:
>Muslims looking to get into NZ seem to have to be better than NZ citizens to get in if they're African or Middle Eastern>Muslims looking to get into Europe get in automatically if they come from a violent (i.e. shitty people) countryThe gulf between the two varieties of Muslims is vast, since one is selected for their quality and one is selected for being part of one of the worst places in the world. Prosperous, often well-educated Muslims vs Muslims who act more like lesser primates a lot of the time.
I understand why the shooter did what they did, and public opinion would have been way better if he did it in Europe, but it makes no sense in NZ.
He didn't go outside enough and learned too much from foreigners. New Zealand isn't facing the threat of a Muslim flood, Muslims here aren't horrible people, he just killed a bunch of good people who follow a bad religion instead of a bunch of bad people who follow a bad religion.
