>>38469230The problem is, most of the time, people taking the time to explain why they feel she's wrong or making fun of her, are what she includes in "harassment". She's also memory-holing the fact that many of those people were female, including other female content creators.
Also, for the people that are actually trying to do damage, she can just point her finger to them and/or report them to twitter, for breaking the ToS. Generalizing (AGAIN) is quite literally a "woe is me" argument.
>hidden agendaDoubt so. Most of the time, people like her actually believe in what they say, oblivious to the fact that they are being sexist themselves. They love their echo chambers.
In any case, at most it could be her trying to get brownie points with her ilk. Nothing else.
