>>38474348never, please
>>38475993this shit never save anything, it was the worst sell among the initial audience
>>38476005you can't do shit inferior to those games. on the other hand, remaking them to be good would be such a costly task, it could sink game freak
>>38476084XY just needed a followup or a dlc, not a remake... or, maybe a remake with lower polycount pokemon? maybe this.
>>38478082I'm all for saying gen7 is nice but what is the relation between not liking the gen that did the worst with kantokids and being a jothoddler ? by default, when you say "gen4 was a mistake" you include hgss and those games were bad because the source material was mediocre at best
all in all, gf has shown that they can't fix a game with a remake so, please, don't bother.