/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #38501108

[36 / 5 / ?]

288KiB, 1080x600, Pokemon-Games.jpg.optimal.jpg

Ranking of the gens based solely on Pokemon design

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 09:42:03 No.38501108 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>38501114 >>38501118 >>38501161 >>38501169 >>38501194 >>38501200 >>38501225 >>38501326 >>38501383 >>38501630 >>38502781

>6 > 1 = 2 > 3 > 7 > 4 > 5

YOU CANNOT DISPUTE THIS!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 09:43:28 No.38501111 Report

Quoted By:

I'd raise 4 above 7 and but 2 above 1 but It's a decent list overall!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 09:44:52 No.38501114 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501108
>gen5 last
Based and factpilled

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 809.png, 505KiB, 1203x838

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 09:46:03 No.38501118 Report

Quoted By: >>38501161 >>38501354 >>38501411 >>38502040

>>38501108
5 > 7 > 3 > 1 > 2 > 6 > 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:03:38 No.38501161 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501108
>1 had some of the worst designs in the series, very hit or miss
>7 had great designs
>6 was overall garbage
3/10 list, try harder next time

>>38501118
Much better, but I think 5 is way lower

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:06:33 No.38501169 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501108
based taste right here

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1549574543135.jpg, 148KiB, 1000x1400

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:15:45 No.38501188 Report

Quoted By:

3 > 1 > 5 > 7 > 4 > 2 > 6

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:16:53 No.38501194 Report

Quoted By: >>38501354 >>38501411

>>38501108
5>3>6>4>7>=2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1
This is the only correct order

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:18:25 No.38501200 Report

Quoted By: >>38501209 >>38501221 >>38501222

>>38501108
7 > 2 > 4 > 5 > 3 > 6 > 1

Jojo parts btw, not pokeshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:21:01 No.38501209 Report

Quoted By: >>38501254 >>38501354 >>38501411 >>38502014

>>38501200
>5 >= 6 > 2 > 7 > 3 > 4 > 1 > 8
FTFY

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:24:47 No.38501221 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501200
nice dubs
this and the OP are the only real rankings

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 23a.jpg, 27KiB, 500x375

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:25:08 No.38501222 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501200
>mfw this is a top tier taste list for both jojo and pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:25:55 No.38501225 Report

Quoted By: >>38501254

>>38501108
1=2>5>4>3>6>8>7

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:32:00 No.38501254 Report

Quoted By: >>38501286

>>38501209
>>38501225
>8
are you autistic by any chance

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:40:44 No.38501286 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501254
Yes, asperger.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:47:10 No.38501320 Report

Quoted By:

As long as the odd numbered gens are above the even numbered gens you're welcome in my humble abode

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:48:39 No.38501326 Report

Quoted By: >>38501377

>>38501108
>6
>good
Need I remind you about Delphox, Kelfki, Barbaracle and Abomatisse?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 10:58:56 No.38501354 Report

Quoted By: >>38501377 >>38501413 >>38501532 >>38501568 >>38501581

>>38501118
>>38501194
>>38501209
look at this samefag, 5 had the shittest mons by far. Quality > Quanitity, gen 5 is shit in this regard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 11:03:58 No.38501377 Report

Quoted By: >>38501799

>>38501354
Wrong

>>38501326
But delphox is good (only braixen is lower on quality) and aromatisse is fine, beisdes there are way worse object mons than klefki

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 11:05:08 No.38501383 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501108
Nah

5 > 7 > 6 > 4 > 2 > 3 > 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 11:06:50 No.38501393 Report

Quoted By:

Even the good ones are hit or miss, so based only on the good of each:
1>3>5>2>4>7>6

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 11:10:31 No.38501411 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501118
>>38501194
>>38501209
absolutely based

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 11:10:47 No.38501413 Report

Quoted By:

3>2>7>5>1>6>4
>>38501354
>Quality > Quanitity
Doesn’t exist in Pokémon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 11:50:38 No.38501532 Report

Quoted By: >>38501568

>>38501354
pretty much this

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:02:15 No.38501568 Report

Quoted By: >>38501663

>>38501532
>>38501354
Wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:06:51 No.38501581 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501354
If Quality > Quantity exists, then why are Gen 6 and 7 so shit

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1552883411818.gif, 67KiB, 328x168

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:20:49 No.38501630 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501108
1>2>3>4>>5>>>6>>>>7

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:28:28 No.38501663 Report

Quoted By: >>38501730

>>38501568
you are

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:38:54 No.38501730 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501663
There is no such thing as quality over quantity when it comes to pokemon
This logic falls flat when we’re still getting divisive designs

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:42:38 No.38501745 Report

Quoted By: >>38501821

If we're ranking the good ones only, then

5 > 7 > 4 > 6 > 3 > 2 > 1

If we're ranking by which gen has the least amount of shit designs, then

6 > 7 > 2 > 3 > 5 > 4 > 1

6 had no outright bad designs besides the slug final evo, but the other gens have more exceptional ones I think

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:50:39 No.38501799 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501377
Braxien isn't bland lifeless garbage

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 12:55:21 No.38501821 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501745
>6 had no outright bad designs besides the slug final evo
Your kinda right, tho Binacle looks like a fakemon and Gogoat should’ve been a single stage

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 13:39:58 No.38502014 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501209
Good taste here

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 13:45:36 No.38502040 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501118
Contrarians leave please.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 14:22:18 No.38502229 Report

Quoted By:

1 > 2 > 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 > 5 > 6 > 7

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2019 16:06:55 No.38502781 Report

Quoted By:

>>38501108
6 > 7 > 2 = 4 > 3 > 1 > 5

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Ranking of the gens based solely on Pokemon design