>>38578559But that's not exactly the most adequate analogy.
First, there are only 2 subjects in your case (you & your pokemon) whereas in your greentext case there are 4 subjects (you, the black person, your ascendants & the black person's ascendants).
Second, ghe affection that "justifies" the damage, in your case, is done by you against your pokemon directly whereas, in the second case, it's done by your ascendants against the black person ascendants.
You may notice that in the second case you have no real interaction with the black person and only through the questionable interpretation that you and your ascendants are the same in spirit or that guilty overpass through descendants the black person would be justified, for now we may not discuss if the sole act of retribution was or not right as that depends on the circunstances.
In the first case, there's no need to do a interpretation to "traspass" the guilty as you're effectively the identified transgresor.
Therefore, that attempt of analogy is defective. Unless you want to find a goof argument to affirm that culpability can be "inherited".
