>>38710063>firstly gren-ash isnt a megaStop nitpicking. It's close enough to one
>secondly what do megas, ub's, and legends/mythicals have in common. high bst's. wow who would have thought that pokemon with good stats would be good in battles? gee go figure That, and broken abilities and movepools. High BSTs aren't a guarantee that a Pokemon will be overpowered, but it certainly helps
>thirdly you're literally only showing s, a+ and a rank as if that's the entirety of the ou metaThat's all I could fit. I'll make a full version of the image if you want, but I thought it would be enough to make my point
>and this whole categorisation argument is fucking trash to begin with. the idea that a pokemon being a mega/legend necessarily implies it's good hasnt been true for the past 10 yearsSame with the high BST, a Pokemon being a Mega/UB/Legend/whatever doesn't guarantee it would be good, but a Pokemon of those categories are far more likely to be broken and overpowered
What did you want from this post?
