>>38810571Woah woah hold it. There's that leftism again.
You either believe in free speech or you don't. You don't believe in free speech, you are more about feelings then facts. About your religion then rationality.
>factually false and insulting to other people, its reprehensible.So what if its factually true and still insulting to people? It still needs to be censored? Of course it does, because it will be an existential threat to you! You know what I find reprehensible, that you think your lifestyle needs to be accepted by others, and to shut down all opposition to it. It's no wonder what has always been more common, are not laws restricting the right to call out homosexuals, but laws restricting homosexual practices in civilization, Stalin didn't defeat Hitler because he thought LBGT rights mattered, because the latter is actually more destructive to humanity.
There are alot of statistics and studies that have been done on homosexuality, and many of them have grave implications for homosexuals and whether it actually is ethical to promote this political idea of LBGTQ2SA+++. You would advocate censoring this, along with any narrative that comes out of them, because the truth would be too dangerous, and that it's wrong, using this evidence, to prevent homosexuals from blood donations or adopting children. Such as child abuse, how homosexuality co-morbids with other sexual deviancy, how a good minority of homosexuals actually revert to heterosexuality as they age, or the extremely large rates of infidelity in the homosexual community. Or that LBGT is a far left political movement.
You're lucky that most of the people who don't like you have been kinda dumb, but I must admit, seeing this slippery slope these past few years makes me rethink my position regarding homosexuality. When the majority of LBGT people hate white people and want open borders, you start to wonder why they think biting the hand that feeds them was a good idea.
