/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #39048613

[37 / 10 / ?]

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:29:05 No.39048613 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>39048989 >>39049169 >>39049519

>Just because they had 807 mons on a game developed on a 2011 handheld doesn't mean they can make on with 80 more for a 2017 home console!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:31:50 No.39048626 Report

Quoted By: >>39048659 >>39048767 >>39048996

I really am curious to see what kind of crap they made that led them to remove pokemon. I expect something like 2000 models for Hop and Sonia. Incredible frame drops and crashes in the Wild area. Boy is gonna be painful

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:36:59 No.39048659 Report

Quoted By: >>39048709 >>39048741

>>39048626
Watch the scene of Dynamaxing your pokemon, rather than appear as a giant right away It grows slowly, that means GF probably didn't make only one completely new model for each Dynamax pokemon but like 3 or 4

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO this sucks.png, 691KiB, 720x540

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:47:53 No.39048709 Report

Quoted By: >>39048727

>>39048659
>game's gimmick is literally finally being the console pokemon everyone always wanted
>"our gimmick for this game is making Pokemon grow giant! We had to cut half the Pokedex to do this though ha ha"

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:50:41 No.39048727 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048709
This is all a dream. I am in coma and will soon wake up.

Come on THIS CAN'T BE REAL

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:53:18 No.39048741 Report

Quoted By: >>39048758 >>39049533

>>39048659
>source: my ass
I've seen so many people spread this "multiple models for dynamaxing" BS like it's fact, look man I hate the state of the game as much as anyone else, but if people continue to spread this misinformation it only makes our legitimate points lose their weight.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO GAME FREAK incompetence.jpg, 248KiB, 1056x1200

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:56:08 No.39048758 Report

Quoted By: >>39048784 >>39049091

>>39048741
>-that means Game Freak PROBABLY...
>+S-stop saying this like a fact..!
Off yourself, pathetic GFshill

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 10:57:24 No.39048767 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048626
>2000 Sonia
Yes, please.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:01:18 No.39048784 Report

Quoted By: >>39048793 >>39048827

>>39048758
>I-I'm just saying "probably", so it doesn't mean I'm lying through my teeth to push an agenda!

fucking epic.

>GF shill
>what is reading comprehension

zoomer detected

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1470460769064.gif, 66KiB, 533x300

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:02:39 No.39048787 Report

Quoted By: >>39048925 >>39049157 >>39049492

>one model for the base pokemon
>another model when the Dynamax begins
>another one when it's growing even more
>another one when it's fully Dynamaxed

>that makes 4 models for each pokemon species
>every alternative form counts as even another species because it's another model
>and you add even 3 more models for each form/species that can Gigantamax too
Jesus christ, the starters alone have 36 models, or even 45 if they can Gigantamax on top Dynamax

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:04:01 No.39048793 Report

Quoted By: >>39048854

>>39048784
>P-PROBABLY DOESN'T MEAN YOU AREN'T CLAIMING SOMETHING AS TRUE
Based ESL retard

Trypp F'haag !!bZFPoDj7jq3

Trypp F'haag !!bZFPoDj7jq3 Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:09:30 No.39048818 Report

Quoted By:

>owed
>for $60
If you're paying $60, you deserve a good product. At least a product that's not directly worse than its $40 predecessor.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO suggestion to kys.jpg, 12KiB, 460x276

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:11:07 No.39048827 Report

Quoted By: >>39048874

>>39048784
>doesn't know what probably means
>doesn't explain how he's lying
>zoomer boogeyman
>IF YOU'RE NOT A SHIT-EATING, COCKSUCKING SHILL, YOU MUST BE AN EVIL ZOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMUUUUUHHHHHHHHH!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:17:04 No.39048854 Report

Quoted By: >>39048902

>>39048793
>acknowledging the possibility that something might be true, does not mean you are acknowledging the possibility that it may be true

who's the retard again?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1560596555305.png, 92KiB, 499x377

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:19:23 No.39048871 Report

Quoted By:

How the fuck can you be entitled to something you're paying $60 for? "Entitled" is when you get something for free but are stuck up about it, if anything, Gamefreak is entitled for cutting Pokemon but still expecting us to buy SnS and Home.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:20:46 No.39048874 Report

Quoted By: >>39048889 >>39048903

>>39048827
>doesn't explain how he's lying

he is lying by giving legitimacy to something that there is no way in hell he can know the legitimacy of. It's as likely that Dynamaxing is a aseparate model as it is likely that Masuda sucks dick on weekends. There is no way you could possibly be sure, and then people are gonna go and ignore that "probably" and spread that Dynamaxing pokémon are different models, like it happened with the dumb cunt that started spreading that the clouds above the pokémon counted the number of dynamaxed mons and everyone parroted him like it was fact when all it took was 3 mintues of looking at E3 gameplay to disprove it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:22:53 No.39048889 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048874
dynamaxed *turns

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:25:28 No.39048902 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048854
And acknowledging the possibility that something might be true (what I did) and stating it's true without a doubt (what you said I did) are completely different thing, retard

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Totems.jpg, 101KiB, 1280x720

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:25:29 No.39048903 Report

Quoted By: >>39048922

>>39048874
>It's as likely that Dynamaxing is a aseparate model as it is likely that Masuda sucks dick on weekends.
It's way more likely than you're making it out to be. Especially considering this wouldn't be the first time scaled-up models were counted as different forms.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:30:05 No.39048922 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048903
sure thing, but as it stands, with no access to the game files, there's no way we can know for sure

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO masudajust_0.jpg, 72KiB, 336x418

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:30:35 No.39048925 Report

Quoted By: >>39048941

>>39048787
You overestimate the space that models take and underestimate the capacity of a Switch cartridge. Even if what you said was true there is probably still plenty of space available to accommodate every Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:32:35 No.39048941 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048925
Well, yeah, but it means they have to waste time making them which is the problem.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:39:04 No.39048989 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048613
Typical Dexit fag using straw man arguments.

Nobody said the Switch wasn't powerful enough.

The issue is that it takes increased time to develop HD games.

That said, GF has 140 employees total, 70 working on SwSh. It's inexscusable, they should've hired 150 more devs 3 years ago.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:40:10 No.39048996 Report

Quoted By: >>39049040 >>39049570

>>39048626
I think it was the fact that they wanted to rush this game out to meet their yearly quota instead of trying to make a polished game. They’re going the way of Madden and Cod at this point.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:45:50 No.39049040 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048996
And I hate that they feel the need to do yearly releases. I don't care about waiting an extra year if it meant I'd get a higher-quality game in return. Plus it's not like Pokemon as a brand needs the revenue from annual releases that badly.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO YouraRetard.png, 83KiB, 604x692

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:53:34 No.39049091 Report

Quoted By: >>39049122 >>39049168

>>39048758

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 11:58:30 No.39049122 Report

Quoted By:

>>39049091
fucking thank you, finally some fact-checking

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1560457157368.jpg, 190KiB, 640x426

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:04:24 No.39049157 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048787
>forgetting shiny pokemon, pokemon with gender differences, pokemon with appearance quirks like Spinda and Deerling/Sawsbuck Who is probably getting cut because of this very reason

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:05:18 No.39049168 Report

Quoted By: >>39049464

>>39049091
>no defense for the biggest problem, the thousands Lillies

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:05:19 No.39049169 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048613
>entitled for wanting consistency
I fucking hate people.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:45:12 No.39049464 Report

Quoted By:

>>39049168
>REGARDING DUPLICATE MODELS FOR MAPS
Kill you are self, onegaishimasu.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:48:36 No.39049492 Report

Quoted By: >>39049508

>>39048787
You forget the overworld models, who need to be different because they kinda walk/move/float.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:50:18 No.39049503 Report

Quoted By:

It's not a matter of "can", it's a matter of "is it worth our time", and the answer is probably no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:50:45 No.39049508 Report

Quoted By:

>>39049492
Those are the same as the battle models, and the walking animations for them existed since Sun and Moon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:52:05 No.39049519 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048613
Entitled is just the new buzz word people like mentally jacking themselves off with.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:53:51 No.39049533 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048741
They're basing it off of what happened with Sun and Moon and gamefreak making multiple models for multiple characters for really no good reason.

So it's not really coming straight out of thin air.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jun 2019 12:58:47 No.39049570 Report

Quoted By:

>>39048996
It can't be the case, Pokémon isn't even yearly

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches