>>39056955>We all knew this day was coming. There would come a time when there would be too many PokémonPerhaps when we reached the tens of thousands, not almost 900.
>to balanceYou know damn well this has absolutely nothing to do with balance. If you think Game Freak has even the most remote, fleeting interest in balancing the game, you'd have to be dumb enough to require a personal caretaker.
>What Game Freak is doing now is smart.Objectively false. Literally everybody hates this move and can see how clear an attempt to cut corners it is. Even the normies have caught on.
>We're going to see a lot more variations to our favorite pokemonNew animations in a new game should be the standard, not a selling point, and certainly not anything to make up for losing Pokemon.
>Along with multiple buffs, making every pokemon goodDo you have anything that could even be considered a hint towards this, let alone proof?
