>>39095256>So as you speak of not spreading pseudoscience but that's what exactly what you're doing because all this is falseNo, you anti-racists retard. IQ science is not false, the findings regarding race are so goddamn consistent that they cannot be false. You sound like a fucking creationists at this point.
Where is the false? Show me studies its false, and I mean studies that actually critique the IQ studies on race themselves.
You don't know a goddamn thing about the science, but you call it "pseudoscience" because your inability to understand genetics, and your hurt feelings makes you think you can do so. Disgusting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5muVMrLiso>If you were to track your genetic code you would have black ancestors because guess what human life originated in Africa. Sorry to disappoint you but this is a fact.That is the blackest thing I ever read. Like, holy shit, do you even understand genetics? First, its irrelevant. If you trace back hard enough, your descendant was some North American tree mammal, has no relevance to genetic distribution of intelligence among populations.
Second, all non-Africans descend from a particular group of people who left Africa. But these people weren't BANTU. So you are wrong even on that count. Because the people who would later become Bantu would emerge from later, then your wrong, not a single non-African would have Bantu ancestry. In fact, the Khoi San people, are probably what the people who left Africa actually looked like, and who used to be the majority in Africa.
>I'm working on my doctorate for archeology and genetics And that's the second blackest thing I read. Blatant lies that no one will believe. Yeah, sure you do.
