>>39096817You're not helping to stop it
>>39096760and dynamax is such an amazzzzzzzzing feature right anon?
It is
>we lost a feature that made pokemon that no one really used into something amazing and useful again We didn't lose regular evolutions and regional variants. Also this ignores how not every Pokemon was made to be good at battling
>made other cool pokemon even better You mean look like overdesigned abominations?
>literally just gets bigger Memephrase
>>39096762>What shit? The self righteousness when all you're doing is spamming buzzwords
>They're arguments. You mean the same tree and wingull argument have been debunked despite never being serious?
>But critising how the game looks it's valid. Not for Pokemon
>If you defend it without counter-arguments you ARE a shill.Everyone has been but now it's getting annoying as it's crammed into every discussion even with taking up every thread. I don't know how you anons did it, but somehow you're worse than /v/
