Quoted By:
Now that the info has passed,well I still have the same opinion, to buy an incomplete game without real reason...they have the money, the time (3 years anyway) and the possibilities. Game Freak never shows a pronounced lazy policy precisely because there has never been a real movement against one of their games; now that there is one,they see , but say that it's harassment is totally exaggerated, the same,it will not push millionaires to suicide huh. Pokémon is an extremely popular license (the most popular in fact), and mediocrity is limited rewarded. Say that we can't judge this game on the pretext that it has not been released . You have'nt understood anything about the principle of pub .This is also an essential point that I would like to come to:consumers have the duty to be indignant and dissatisfied. A company of this size must be respectful to those who propelled it there and it's not by hiding behind false technical or strategic limitations dismantled over and over again that it will stop. It's simply unjustifiable because Masuda clearly said that all Pokémon would be back on every game (lie), it was the initiative of the Pokémon Bank, eh, and that's serious because it's paid services (and I do not think Pokémon HOME will be free lmao). Advertising calls for the purchase but is also exposed to criticism, it's part of the deal and every business is aware of it, if anyone ever violates the rights of consumers, it would be a huge restriction of freedom. The consumer must be satisfied, it's he who decides whether a company survives or not (the customer is king), if you oppose it, sorry to tell you, but you are fanboys/sheep who defend the business as if they were shareholders, you have brain so washed that you want to promote them for them.
