>>39176089>Not at all true.Yes, it is. Higher fidelity animations is bullshit. The whole "adventure" and "selection" aspect is also bullshit, all other games did it no problem. Balance is covered elsewhere.
>It spend several paragraphs whining about Kanto despite there being other mons in the games We just had a game full of Kanto pandering, we are now being peddled Charizard again and some people defend cuts reasoning they want to provide "fresh experience". It just isn't right.
>There are more mons in the games nowIn XY there were over 700 mons total, we got over 400 Pokemon in the dex. In SM there were new mon, but the dex rolled back to above 200 mon. It's possible they'll give us more mon this time around like they did in XY because of moving to a new platform, but expecting the game to have more than 500 Pokemon is being overly optimistic to say the least.
>but they obviously care about balancing the games as they even made fairy type Which showed care at the shallowest level possible. Then they introduced Mega Ray a game later.
>It is as long as there's still a decent amount Not really.
>Not true. The current meta in smogon is just fine.If it is, then why purge? Why solve a problem that doesn't exist?
>We don't know anything about it We don't know enough to make a deep analysis of it, but enough to figure out where it's going.
>Theorizing means hes making up things to pass off as fact. Infographs shouldn't have your opinion on itIt's there to make you think about the problem.
>Home is not bank, we barely know about it, three dollars a year isnt a lot and an assumption is not a fact. Home is a service more robust than the Bank, which cost 5 dollars a year - laughable for what it did. Considering we will be charged 50% more for Sword and Shield than every game before LGPE, it's fair to assume that Home will cost at least just as much as the Bank.
>Not really.Yes, really. Here are some comments from Twitter and Nintendolife's comment section.
