>>39273866I suspect we'll simply disagree on what the Holodomor represents - you see it as the explicit destruction of the Ukrainians for the purpose of getting rid of a group the commies disliked, since that's how history and politics looks to you, whereas I see it as an unsurprising result of any sort of government trying to do massive structural change in an extremely short period of time - they were time-efficient, therefore they were inefficient in every single other way in a manner that most people would describe as brutal and unreasonable.
Of course, I am always confused by the right's obsession with the Holodomor - you all like the Holocaust, right? You like it when the weak are killed and the strong survive, so given that particular way of thinking shouldn't you find it acceptable? I assume it's not acceptable because, to you, Soviet Russia is secretly jewish and the jews are, of course, inherently weak, thus it's a violation of the rule of the strong preying on the weak rather than a representation of it.
