>>39279669>No new designs>Same designUsing the same statement two times doesn't make your point more valid. And just wait, there will be gigantimax forms for sure
>Explode when faintingImplying this isn't fun
>No connection with trainerAwful lie to sell us Megaevolution. Put an item in your Pokémon isn't not epic at all.
>Big PokeballWhat's the point to complain about things that actually are cool? Just because you don't like Dynamax doesn't mean there are things that could be aesthetic
>Only for gyms and raidI can't wait to megaevolve my Pokémon against a Rattata
>No dynamax mega evolutionTerrible idea. Only acceptable if were like
>>39278954 said
>Megas give forms of beloved PokémonI don't care if Garchomp and Salamence are beloved. I want to play with my favorites, and only one of the Pokémon that got mega was in my faves, and it wasn't even necessary because it was already good so I was against this one too
>Revives use in underrated PokémonImplying dynamax will not do this
>Gives love to forgotten PokémonThe only mega to forgotten Pokémon was Audino and was one of the worst.
>keeps movesYes, because it was the dynamax's gimmick, not mega's gimmick
Megas were shit, biased and made Pokémon like Mawile useless forever because Megas were gone indefinitely (with zero chances to get a real evolution now). If a mechanic works with everything this doesn't limit the future of these Pokémon.
They could had make Megas unbiased if you could at least megaevolve all Pokémon keeping its design and give him +20 in all stats except HP, but this didn't happen because they preferred to shoehorn the Kanto starter and Lucario.
If you miss Mega-Mawile, use Mega-Aipom. It's the same, but hands instead jaws
