>>39326303Normally I would not waste time arguing in english with either a functional retard or a shitposter, but this time I will do an exception and waste my precious time on this post, not for the sake of arguing itself which honestly i couldn't give less fucks about but for the sake of not letting newfags, may sone of them happen on this thread, to be mistaught/misled by your sophism.
Implying that you can't determinate a transpersonal definition of a quality standard is a fallacy that has been debunked so far as ancient greek civilization.
You claim the game isn't objectivly bad because, appealing to the theory of big numebers, you claim: "There must be someone who would appreciate those games after all, so you can't state they are bad".
The fallacy here is implying that people can't have substandard taste. Guess what? There also are people who like aeting shit for example, coprophagists, yet it is not tollered by any standards that restaurants serve plates with fecal matter in them, may it be because cooks don't wash their hands after going to the toilet and don't like to use toilet paper.
Now, if you like crap, that is fine, but that doesn't exonerates other to call it shit.
Now that your subjective fallacy has been debunked, I will also remind you all why the game is shit.
1) As already proven[1], the game unduly removes un unspecified number of old pokemon species. As previous game had them all for free, this constitute a lowering of the standard, and is indeed an issue despite you have or have not never completed the national pokedex.
2) The problems of those games are not only in the pokemon culling, there are indeed other issues, like shittier animation than 3DS, Wild Area being dull and empty, shittt textures, shitty gimmick, etc...
[1]Switch Cartridge can hold 32GB while all pokemon models and data are not heavier than 3GB
