>>39345369I'm gonna be completely honest based on what I've seen so far. Let's get the negative ones and compare them to the positives, yeah?
>Not all Pokemon will be usable in Galar because of some dumbass rule that Disallow Pokemon that are not in Galar Pokedex to enter>We are promised high quality animations, fidelity, and uniqueness of the games instead, so a fair trade, yes?What we've got so far are
REUSED MODELS FROM XY, a six year old games
REUSED ANIMATIONS from XY/ORAS/SM/USUM
Tree
Bicycle clipping the ground
water reflection
NPC animations
Graphics that look like a PS3 games at best (and I'm being fucking generous here)
Unnaturally floating Wingull
Dynamax is literally (yes, literally) just the Pokemon getting bigger
Gigantamax is a combination of Mega Evolution, Z-Moves with side effects to the battlefield that we still can't see (where are the floating stones? Where are the spikes, spider net, etc.)
>Dialogues are asinine and feels like as if it's written for five year olds.Now, the good ones
Human Characters look pretty to look at, especially the females like Sonia, Nessa, Bea, Gloria(I fundamentally disagree with everything that goes into her naming choice)
Starters are cute, but that's pretty standard. Terrible head to body ratio though.
The only good one so far I see is Corviknight. Others are moronic. Yes, even the cake. It's fucking cake, what the fuck.
So no, OP, maybe you fuck off. We cannot tolerate GameFreak's laziness any longer. National Dex cut is them cutting corners.
USUM had 808+808(shiny) models of Pokemon IN A HANDHELD. How come Switch, A CONSOLE, can't?
