>>39352862This isn't about me being mad, it's about knowing all the informations before judging, unlike all the retards on here who are willing to suck the dick of any alternative to game freaks.
I'm not saying we shouldn't ask for better than what we're given, but stop simplifying everything.
>>39352886This explains a lot. Sure the animations are of better quality in general, but they'd have to make them a lot more reusable in order to achieve this level of quality on all pokémon, with how many moves they all have available.
Also we still don't know how many pokémon there are in there.
>>39352922The fact that the pokémon company makes that much money has very little to do with game freak's actual budget though. They work with what they're given and in how much time they allowed. Again, not saying they don't seriously need to rethink everything they do, but thinking it's as simple as throwing money at the problem is ridiculous
