>>39373691My sexual preferences are irrelevant. My apologies if my earlier post was offensive or too sassy. Really, I'm just trying to understand why people want to have an established male character in straight lewd material, that was made with the demographic of hetero males in mind.
For example, straight shota, since that's what's being discussed in this thread. After reading what some anons said, I can understand why they'd be into straight shota. But after everyone here saw him, why do they want to see Masters-kun specifically put into that scenario? Why not just use a generic shota character? The interaction the boy will have with the girl, I guess in this case Masters-chan, would be the same, and it's that shota x girl interaction I'd assume you're looking for, not necessarily the boy himself.
I'm not sure if I explained it correctly... I suppose what I'm really trying to say is why fixate on a specific boy, like say Masters-kun or even Allister, since he's been a topic of discussion recently, even though the final result will be the same if you were to just use a generic self-insert? Most het stuff is usually illustrated from the perspective of the male anyways, so it's not like you'll really be seeing the characters themselves, maybe outside of a couple panels if it's done in such a style.