>>39373874That's not what I asked, no surprise to see you deflecting, It personally not affecting you, and you used personally so you at least recognize it's a subjective standpoint, does nothing to explain why the opinions of those who are effected by that retarded. There's also the viewpoint of people like me, who won't get affacted by the cut but refuse to buy a game so lazy that has half the pokemon for no justifyable reason, which is rationally a better reason than simply subjectively examine if it hurts your experience or not. And I'd argue it doesn't look better than 3ds games as jumping to a powerful console should come with raised standards to meet the expectation having more powerful tools at your disposal should have, so it looking underwhelming compared to other switch titles means it's a inferior product compared to something that looked good for its time. As for the gameplay it's the exact same shit with the regional gimmick but with half the pokemon. Most assets are reused as well. So the graphics aren't that good, the gameplay is worse since the selection is narrowed, the animation are copypasted and the region despite for one area looks the exact same as SM. So pray tell, what looks ''marginally better'' than the 3ds games?
