>>39377443I don't understand how someone who types coherently can be this stupid when it's clear that it's a lack of critical thinking skills that pushes people to either extreme of the debate. This is a complex issue that can't be summarized in a single soundbite and to not understand any element of nuance is tribalistic caveman logic.
I'm talking directly to you, Anon. Surely you understand this? I don't believe that you have a grasp of the idiosyncrasies of the English language and yet you're so stupid that this concept never occurred to you. It literally takes not even 5 minutes to distance yourself from the issue, look at it objectively and at least fathom that the debate can't be summed up as 'HURR GAMEFREAK BAD'.
You're assuming that people who aren't on one side of the debate have no opinion, how does that make sense? Do you really mean to tell me that you've never been in a situation that required more than just black and white thinking? Either you're stupid, lazy-brained or you're so emotionally invested you don't want a middle ground to exist because you see this as a fight you have to win as opposed to a problem to be understood.
