/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #39396030

[12 / 2 / ?]

2MiB, 487x289, 1520599300263.gif

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 15:31:52 No.39396030 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>39396052 >>39396402 >>39396433 >>39396725 >>39397418

if you could, which decisions early-on in the series would you change?

I'll start
>most Pokemon in the anime can only communicate by saying their name

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 15:33:30 No.39396046 Report

Quoted By: >>39396402

>Ash gets to achieve his dreams and pass the torch to a new protagonist instead of becoming a decaying marketing puppet

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 15:34:41 No.39396052 Report

Quoted By:

>>39396030
I don't think it would be a good idea but I wonder what the timeline is like where the Psychical Special split happened in gen 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 15:53:20 No.39396213 Report

Quoted By:

>remove kanto in gen2
I get at the time it was going to be the sequel and then it was going to be over, but imagine if the extra space on the cartridge after Iwata compressed everything was used to include other features like following starters(probably not enough space for the extra sprites for all of them but it'd be continuing what yellow did) and give us more fleshed out areas to explore in johto.
>kill the "each game must have something uniquely its own" mentality
Day/night in gen3, including remakes, battle frontier and contests sticking around, amie/refresh keeps minigames. If it isn't directly related to the region itself like how pokepelagio is a chain of small islands in alola(even then port the features to a different location it doesn't have to be islands) then it stays. Basically make more of the stuff fans want into series staples so that not having it would be unacceptable and squash the laziness/excuses right out of the gate.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 15:59:53 No.39396276 Report

Quoted By: >>39396292

Have the games evolve.
Introduce new features each game, but also keep old features and expand on them.
Add more evolutions for old Pokémon, for an easy example. Also add more Pokémon with evolution requirements like trading, friendship, or fuckin weird things, like inkay

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 16:01:10 No.39396292 Report

Quoted By:

>>39396276
less trading and friendship and more stuff like inkay frienship evos are cancer

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 16:13:37 No.39396402 Report

Quoted By:

>>39396030
>>39396046
Ash doesn't exist and the anime uses the male or female protagonist of the games

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 16:16:53 No.39396433 Report

Quoted By:

>>39396030
Kill development of all third/enhanced versions and fire anyone who pushes for them. Make the first installments good.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 16:37:19 No.39396685 Report

Quoted By:

>Add genders and breeding in Gen 1
>Make special not one stat in Gen 1
>Fix breeding incense by either making it one item that works for all applicable Pokémon with baby stages or not introduce it at all and have baby stages be a retcon or day care and NPC gift exclusive

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1562087585255.jpg, 188KiB, 500x1944

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 16:40:33 No.39396725 Report

Quoted By:

>>39396030
>Remove trade evolution. Encourage trading through other means. Maybe getting rare items or giving your Pokemon a chance to turn shiny during the trade.
>Make following Pokemon a staple after Yellow.
>Make EVS training more accessible and actually tell players about it. Maybevjust allowing players to directly edit EV distribution in post game facilities. Making it more accessible players more players would actually beat post game facilities and gamefreak would have no excuse to remove them. People would also participate in competitive battling in game and less battle sims and hacking would be done.
>IVS shouldn't be tied to stats.
>Remove natures hindering stats. In game players don't have to worry about getting a hindering nature (Adamant Alakazam) but you would still strive for a good nature competitive wise.
>No more yearly releases for mainline titles. More time should be taken to make sure each Pokemon game is amazing. Spin offs and smaller scale games could be used to fill gaps.
>Introduce phys/special split earlier. If I can't do this at least try to make certain types stat spreads make sense. Why dies Kanto have so many physical water types? Also make Dark physical and Ghost special.
>Try to make sure each Pokemon has a use. Either they're decent in game and/or strong in competitive/post game. Simple stuff like certain Pokemon like Farfetchd not having shit stats, evolution levels making sense and better movepools. Less Pokemon that become worthless later in game like beedrill.
>Constantly building upon from the last game. No more removal of features to make a game "unique".
>Give players the option to skip tutorials and/or make tutorials more straight to the point.
>Elemental punches should have stayed as TMS.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 16:43:21 No.39396768 Report

Quoted By:

Remove Critical Hits entirely, or at the very least make them 1.5x at Gen 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2019 17:39:07 No.39397418 Report

Quoted By:

>>39396030
Designated Charizard slot l

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches