>>39402288That's the thing, though. His script feels like a run-on sentence that tries to touch on every single topic of the gen instead of following a more clear structure. It always goes like "gen 3 was like this for this pokemon: it introduced this, but it also had a threat in this, although it could also do this, but there was an introduction in this, even though there was a threat there, but it could run that, and there was another introduction there that implied threats that made it run that in specific scenarios", you get the idea.
Say what you want about Smogon analyses, but they're at least laid out in "here's the stats, here's the general idea of the pokemon, these are the most notable/popular sets in the meta, some other options, teammates and its checks and counters"
