>>39431616Troll(s) pretending to be GF apologists. Rule of thumb is that if it's a short, repeated phrase, they're probably just spamming for the lulz than actually trying to persuade you or make GF critics angry.
The real GF apologists are mostly on twitter, a terrible platform to have arguments on due to the constraints on posting that encourages people to boil down their arguments into something asinine.
