>>39602773>The fact that the amount of monsters never really mattered before You're right the amount doesn't matter, as long as we have them all, maybe gamefreak shouldn't make new pokemon if they can't rake care of their old ones?
>The older games with less mons are still seen as payable They had actual good content and post games, and they had all the pokemon programmed into the games anyways, raid battles with get old after 30 minutes when you realize breeding mons is way more fruitful and less effort
>No one cares about cares at the end of the day unless you're a snoyboy Irony because basedboys defend their corporate overlords like yourself all the time
>People will realize they don't NEED corsola in every single game I bet you would shoot up gamefreak ha if charizard was missing from the game
>pre-bank XY proved that a smaller pokedex can be fun or arguably better than a larger dex.X and Y was actual shit, you just said it doesn't matter how many pokemon are in a game but now it makes it fun? Wish you shills could make up your (hive)minds.
