>>39624547Further clarification:
Also I'm not saying the sexualization was the only option I could've taken with it, nor am I am I saying sexualization in designs on general are necessarily a good thing. It's just that it fits more with everything related to it and how it was created. It's basis and just how it looks near the other starters of mine. I wanted to make a more cutsey/pretty, feminine design to better constrast with edginess and mysterious-ness of the bandit rabbit and the tough, monster-equse energy of the snail.
Would it be better if the sexuality was toned down or even deleted? I'm sure it would be. But again it wouldn't have fit the idea I was going for and probably would have blended in with everything going on. The decision of it's overt femininity has more to do with art, basis and it's placement among it's trio than it does wiyh anything else.
At the end of the day, this is all just having fun with the almost endless amount if ideas for Pokémon. If I happen to make something "good" as a by-product then it's a plus. I'm sure most if not all Fakemon artist feel this way.
