>>39626511>You don't even know that they're cutting cornersI don't know it, but it's a reasonable guess considering it's not hard to simply have a Pokemon's data in the game, since they're reusing assets. The only new work they'd have to do is resize the textures, or if we make the assumption that they're using an engine that for whatever reason doesn't work with their old models, convert the models to a functional file type, which would maybe be at the very most a week's worth of work for one employee.
>It could still be 600 out of 800If it was a negligible amount like that, there's absolutely no reason why they couldn't just push the rest of them in. It is not an arduous task, and would be worth the small time investment given how upset people are about it.
>It'll probably still be more than you'd actually ever need to use in the gameHaving only regional pokemon available drastically effects trading and online battles. But even beyond that, the fact of the matter is they're cutting content and saying it's to focus more on graphical quality without actually adding graphical quality. They're lying. There's nothing wrong with holding them accountable for that, and if you think there is, you need to sit down and seriously think about this shit. Having a complaint isn't a tantrum, and saying the people opposing your point of view are "just throwing a childish tantrum" is a really lazy argument in the first place.
