>>39927563But the image is supposed to counter the argument of the physical points that make the model are the same and I'm simply saying nobody is saying the texture is the same as they keep trying to point out that what they consider to be the "model", which is the mesh, is the same thing.
So what I'm basically trying to say is:
NOBODY GIVING THE ARGUMENT THAT THE MODELS ARE THE SAME ARE TALKING ABOUT THE TEXTURES AND THE MESH. They are only fucking talking about the mesh of the model and the only reason as such is because textures are fucking easy to edit compared to making a new mesh.
