>>39962822Either they remade them with higher detail so that they would look adequate when dynamaxed, or there's something technical we don't know.
I'll just wait for the dataminers to dig up the truth before making final judgement, but if they reworked the models for the fucking macro fetish gimmick, I'll be really pissed.
>>39962844Why did they feel the need to spend development time remaking them? Unless there were errors involved I would fail to see the need to make them.