[51 / 6 / ?]
Quoted By: >>40007016 >>40007038 >>40007100 >>40007247 >>40007339 >>40007942 >>40008102 >>40008126 >>40008249 >>40008277 >>40009808 >>40009838 >>40010626 >>40010779 >>40010971 >>40010986 >>40011620 >>40014727
Here's how I predict things will go for the newest Pokemon currently without an evolution line:
>Wooloo: One Evolution After First Form
-Corviknight: No Evolution or Pre-Evolution
>Drednaw: Pre-Evolution Possible, But Unlikely
-Yamper: No Evolution
-Alcremie: No Evolution
>Rolycoly: Two Evolutions After First Form
>Duraludon: Two Pre-Evolutions Before Third Form
-Morpeko: No Evolution
-Cramorant: No Evolution
>Polteageist: One Evolution After First Form
>Impadimp: One Evolution After First Form
My concern is that Dynamaxing/Gigantimaxing might result in many Pokemon who COULD have an evolution line not having one due to the gimmick being prioritized.
>Wooloo: One Evolution After First Form
-Corviknight: No Evolution or Pre-Evolution
>Drednaw: Pre-Evolution Possible, But Unlikely
-Yamper: No Evolution
-Alcremie: No Evolution
>Rolycoly: Two Evolutions After First Form
>Duraludon: Two Pre-Evolutions Before Third Form
-Morpeko: No Evolution
-Cramorant: No Evolution
>Polteageist: One Evolution After First Form
>Impadimp: One Evolution After First Form
My concern is that Dynamaxing/Gigantimaxing might result in many Pokemon who COULD have an evolution line not having one due to the gimmick being prioritized.