[5 / 1 / ?]
Quoted By: >>40049270 >>40049486 >>40049511
Does the concept of marginal utility disprove the notion that the number of Pokemon in a game counts as important content after there are already 400 in it?
It seems like economics proves the existence of box fillers by claiming that every new product (pokemon) added is less valuable than the last one
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_utility
It seems like economics proves the existence of box fillers by claiming that every new product (pokemon) added is less valuable than the last one
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_utility