>>40054748>It doesn't matter what benefits "the most" when it's not item based. There could be times where Dynamaxing my Toxapex wins me the game over Dynamaxing my Tyranitar. If Dynamaxing my Toxapex allows me to tank a key hit or counter some threat my specific opponent is running.What would be the point in dynamaxing a Toxapex?
That mon needs it's support movepool big time. Dynamaxing it would mean it would just be left with dynamax protect, and dynamax max water (assuming it has scald).
Also yes it being item based is a big deal. With megas, and z-moves again. You had to forfeit an item slot. This meant you couldn't have life orb with mega or z-move. You can have life orb with dynamax here though and that's a problem.
>How does it make it worse? It means there are more strategies you can do with it. If anything it makes more Pokemon potentially usable.The only strategy that's gonna be done is to dynamax/gigantamax yourself to counteract the effects. This isn't gonna make that many more mons usable whatsoever. The only way to make more mons usable is to give them selective buffs. Dynamax again only benefits the already powerful pokemon.
>Or not being a retard and not letting your opponent set up for free in the first place.Yeah you know, you can always stop a setup sweeper 100% or a moxie sweeper for sure even now. Let's ask singles Blaziken how we can stop him 100%. Let's also ask Xerneas how to stop it's setup 100% as well.
