>>40117414>I don't. I said "let's say it does", because it's outside our knowledge.Then its a what if argument. What if arguments are by their nature spacious as you can literally argue anything.
>It's not, that's the point.Then if pokemon are in the universe it clearly is, that was point.
>No no, 12345 is not our observation. We've only observed 123, 12345 is the hypothetical truth behind how the universe actually works that is outside our understanding.In otherwords its one giant Mcguffin completely useless as a logical argument as you define these values or how you came to them. That means they can be literally anything.
>We're not adding a 6, we're adding an alternative for an existing number, say.. % instead of 5. We've added a Pokemon that doesn't fit in with 12345, but is instead a %.Why does % replace 5 because its on the same key and held shift? Since they are on the same key doesn't 5=% and thus is interchangable, you could encounter either and it makes no difference.
>We've added a Pokemon that doesn't fit in with 12345, but is instead a %.Or it does fit because 5 is interchangeable with % and doesn't represent a change since they are on the same key. Even if it doesn't why does it replace 5? Are you saying 1 shuckle poofing into existance changes the universes 5 to %? How?
>Either the Pokemon has to be made to adhere to 5, or our universe suddenly becomes 1234%..How. You aren't making any logical sense. What does 5 even represent?
> but that 5 was needed for the current state of our universeAnd what is 5 that is so threatened by a retarded turtle or is your whole argument spacious and empty
>so now it changes radically.I didn't realize shuckle was more powerful then every Arceus.
Your argument has more holes then a soup strainer
