>>40201462>Why yes, labels are real.You don't say but do they translate literally to design? No they don't just look at Bulbasaur.
>female knights are a thing>lmaoYou think they aren't? What does the term Dame mean anon? In the English court it means a female knight.
>And anon there have been many female pokemon represented as such without the use of eyelashesAnd there has been many who have in the anime and manga, giving animals eyelashes to help distinguishes between the sexes is a trope one like to knights you seem to want to deny exists.
>The examples you even gave don't have them.That wasn't the point of those examples though anon. The point was sexual dimorphism is a thing, males and females can look different in design
>Also femstic is defined outwardly as a female unlike Corviknight.And how would you know, we've only seen the reveal again you are assuming Corviknight will look the same male to female either in the games or the anime. You don't know that as we don't even know if the Corviknight we are looking at is male or female, it could very well be female which makes all the masculine talk of yours very questionable about whats on your mind
MEN 
