>>40201940>The argument isn't that it's not worth playing, it's that it's not worth paying for.If the game was worth playing then it wouldn't be a "cash grab," like Anonymous said it was. The game's only a few bucks and plays for like 20-30 hours if you're into it.
>Do you think any of that money goes into the pockets of any of the people who worked on that game? It's a victimless crime. I don't know what kind of agreement Nintendo has set up with the developers regarding eshop sales, but the devs are paid for the product they produce with the understanding that distribution is handed off to another company who might pay more or less for future products. The money changing is way more complicated. I hope gamers will write the devs thank you letters for their games in addition to paying for their products.
>Do you also get mad when homeless people fill their water cup with soda?Yes. They make fast food establishments more disgusting than they already are by doing that and there's always trouble with soda fountains because people treat them like garbage. Breaking levers, filling water cups with soda, dumping ice and straws all over the place. I do hate to see soda fountains mistreated. Soda theft also cause some chains to move the fountains behind the counter where the employees have complete control over the ice levels rather than the customer, and may even spit in your drink if hiring goes badly.
>Does it rustle your jimmies when you see someone try a grape before buying fruit at a store?Not really. Stores understand that this happens and build that factor into the sales price. The price of fruit IS too high for this apparently fruit-producing state I'm in, but I tend to eat canned fruit anyway.
