>>40317729>Most designs now look OKI mean, I know it's purely subjective, but they're not really any better than Sun and Moon. Ironically enough the only one I can say I actually like is Cramorant, everything else twiddles between mediocre to awful.
>Mathematically speaking they have to be goodI mean, if anything, it's more logical that the games will just continue to stagnate as they pander more and more to casual players, I dunno what makes you think Game Freak has some sort of moral code where they A) acknowledge any of their games are bad and B) would feel responsible enough about it to try and fix their mistakes.
>Having three bad Games IN A ROW will kill game freakNo it won't. For one, bad pokemon games still sell like hotcakes. Case and point, the past two generations of games, all selling like hotcakes. Secondly, even if any of the mainline games could ever sell poorly, it'd take a lot more than three tankers to "kill" Game Freak. It'd not only have to bankrupt Game Freak, but it'd also have to completely kill Pokemon as a franchise, which I don't think is even possible considering it's the most profitable media franchise ever.
