>>40340115>but it doesn'tit does
>sell good =/=good gameyeah, but bioshock was well recieved because it was a good game that had all that
>not trueThere's a reason people associate N64 graphics with Rare and that's because the games looked amazing on the console, and played just as good as they looked.
>minecraftAre you seriously that stupid that you don't think someone spent time making sure everything looked right in minecraft? just because it works on low resolution textures doesn't mean no time was spent on it, or did you just not read the part where i point out even games that work with sprites have to have serious visual polish? Hell minecraft is still getting visual polish in updates, so it's clearly not a waste of time, unlike you spending your time in this argument. you've already wasted your time and the time of everyone who had to read your absolutely moronic posts. you should apologize to this board for wasting perfectly good posts with this pathetic slop. Anything you say past this point is no longer worth my time, you have completely and utterly failed to prove your point and the history of game design and what games have been considered the best of the best consistently disproves your entire argument but go on, continue being stubborn and foolish and keep believing that you can't possibly be wrong because obviously it's not YOU who's wrong, it's reality that's wrong, and that's why it disagrees with everything your pathetic self types out onto this board. Now you can grow as a person, accept you're wrong, and move on, or you can keep being an unintelligent ingrate who refuses to see the real world for what it is because they're so insecure and uncomfortable about being wrong they have to deny the truth on an imageboard on the internet, a place where all the information is readily available so the whole world can see your lack of self awareness like the ignorant child you truly are. Farewell, you coat-less Eskimo. Return when you're not an idiot.
